Featured Post

Tom Cruise is Young and Green in The Color of Money: Movie for a #TBT

We threw it back to The Hustler for #TBT a couple of months back. Today, since Tom Cruise is in the  news with Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation breaking Friday, I thought I'd take a look at The Color of Money starring Tom Cruise, Mary Elizabeth Mastroantonio and Paul Newman reprising as Fast Eddie Felson.

While both The Hustler and The Color of Money are both inspired by Walter Tevis books featuring Fast Eddie as the protagonist, the inspiration for the second film is loose at best. 

Here's what the book is about:
After 20 years of hibernation, former pool champion "Fast" Eddie Felson is playing exhibition matches with former rival Minnesota Fats in shopping malls for prizes like cable television. With one failed marriage and years of running a pool hall, Eddie is now ready to regain the skills needed to compete in a world of pool that has changed dramatically since he left it behind. The real challenge comes when Eddie realizes that in order to compete successfully, he must hone his skills in the game of nine-ball as opposed to the straight pool that had once won him fame. With a new generation of competitors, fear and doubt and the daily possibility of failure arise, giving Fast Eddie a new challenge to overcome.
Which has almost nothing to do with the movie: 
Fast Eddie Felson teaches a cocky but immensely talented protégé the ropes of pool hustling, which in turn inspires him to make an unlikely comeback.

Cruise, at just 24, is that cocky but talented protege. As Roger Ebert pointed out in his 1986 review of the film, Eddie uses Carmen (Mary Elizabeth Mastroantonio) Vincent's somewhat older girlfriend, to make Vincent (Cruise) jealous. His goal is to subtly undermine the kid's confidence, making him more pliable and susceptible to Eddie's own plans to make some green off the newbie.

While Paul Newman won a Best Actor Oscar and Mary Elizabeth Mastroani received a lot of positive reviews including both Oscar and Golden Globe nominations, Tom Cruise was the odd man out. But that makes sense, he was the young guy, playing the trope of trying to knock the big man down a notch. 

In the end, both Fast Eddie and Paul Newman, were far too big to fail. Instead it's the young man, full of swagger and ambition, who sees maybe he's got some living to do, some lessons to learn, before he finds his place in the world too. 

Directed by Martin Scorsese from an Academy Award winning screenplay by Richard Price, The Color of Money has been on my 'to see' list for a long time. Oh, I watched it a long time ago—that would be when it came out in 1986—but mostly I remember being unimpressed. The seediness of the pool hall, the crassness of the culture, the character manipulations turned me off. I was looking for confirmation that the world was a better, brighter place than it was, than it is, the harsh ugly truth was an unwelcome turnoff. At the tail end of a long, ill-fated relationship, it's possible that I saw everything through, not rose-tinted, but dark glasses, the kind blind people used to wear, not to help them see, just to shield the public from staring at their unseeing eyes. 

It's time to revisit this particular movie from the past if only to check in with that very enthusiastic boyish Tom Cruise. How could we be surprised at his couch-jumping antics when it's clear early on that boundless enthusiasm is in his DNA? At 53, Tom Cruise may have mellowed and grown in real self-assurance and confidence. His Mission Impossible' Ethan Hunt may be the guy that can do it all, but it's Tom Cruise, and his youthful boundless enthusiasm, that drives the car, and climbs aboard moving planes. Let's take a look at the boy before he became the man. The Color of Money is available to stream on youtube, GooglePlay, Amazon and Vudu.

Check out the trailer for The Color of Money
Movie for a #ThrowbackThursday

Read Roger Ebert's original 1986 review:

"If this movie had been directed by someone else, I might have thought differently about it because I might not have expected so much. But "The Color of Money" is directed by Martin Scorsese, the most exciting American director now working, and it is not an exciting film. It doesn't have the electricity, the wound-up tension, of his best work, and as a result I was too aware of the story marching by.
Scorsese may have thought of this film as a deliberately mainstream work, a conventional film with big names and a popular subject matter; perhaps he did it for that reason. But I believe he has the stubborn soul of an artist, and cannot put his heart where his heart will not go. And his heart, I believe, inclines toward creating new and completely personal stories about characters who have come to life in his imagination - not in finishing someone else's story, begun 25 years ago.
"The Color of Money" is not a sequel, exactly, but it didn't start with someone's fresh inspiration. It continues the story of "Fast Eddie" Felson, the character played by Paul Newman in Robert Rossen's "The Hustler" (1961). Now 25 years have passed. Eddie still plays pool, but not for money and not with the high-stakes, dangerous kinds of players who drove him from the game. He is a liquor salesman, a successful one, judging by the long, white Cadillac he takes so much pride in. One night, he sees a kid playing pool, and the kid is so good that Eddie's memories are stirred.
This kid is not simply good, however. He is also, Eddie observes, a "flake," and that gives him an idea: With Eddie as his coach, this kid could be steered into the world of big-money pool, where his flakiness would throw off the other players. They wouldn't be inclined to think he was for real. The challenge, obviously, is to train the kid so he can turn his flakiness on and off at will - so he can put the making of money above every other consideration, every other lure and temptation, in the pool hall.
The kid is named Vincent (Tom Cruise), and Eddie approaches him through Vincent's girlfriend, Carmen (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio). She is a few years older than Vince and a lot tougher. She likes the excitement of being around Vince and around pool hustling, but Eddie sees she's getting bored. He figures he can make a deal with the girl; together, they'll control Vince and steer him in the direction of money.
A lot of the early scenes setting up this situation are very well handled, especially the moments when Eddie uses Carmen to make Vince jealous and undermine his self-confidence. But of course these scenes work well, because they are the part of the story that is closest to Scorsese's own sensibility. In all of his best movies, we can see this same ambiguity about the role of women, who are viewed as objects of comfort and fear, creatures that his heroes desire and despise themselves for desiring. Think of the heroes of "Mean Streets," "Taxi Driver" and "Raging Bull" and their relationships with women, and you sense where the energy is coming from that makes Vincent love Carmen, and distrust her.
The movie seems less at home with the Newman character, perhaps because this character is largely complete when the movie begins. "Fast Eddie" Felson knows who he is, what he thinks, what his values are.
There will be some moments of crisis in the story, as when he allows himself, to his shame, to be hustled at pool. But he is not going to change much during the story, and maybe he's not even free to change much, since his experiences are largely dictated by the requirements of the plot.
Here we come to the big weakness of "The Color of Money": It exists in a couple of timeworn genres, and its story is generated out of standard Hollywood situations. First we have the basic story of the old pro and the talented youngster. Then we have the story of the kid who wants to knock the master off the throne. Many of the scenes in this movie are almost formula, despite the energy of Scorsese's direction and the good performances. They come in the same places we would expect them to come in a movie by anybody else, and they contain the same events.
Eventually, everything points to the ending of the film, which we know will have to be a showdown between Eddie and Vince, between Newman and Cruise. The fact that the movie does not provide that payoff scene is a disappointment. Perhaps Scorsese thought the movie was "really" about the personalities of his two heroes, and that it was unnecessary to show who would win in a showdown. Perhaps, but then why plot the whole story with genre formulas, and only bail out at the end? If you bring a gun onstage in the first act, somebody will have been shot by the third.
The side stories are where the movie really lives. There is a warm, bittersweet relationship between Newman and his long-time girlfriend, a bartender wonderfully played by Helen Shaver. And the greatest energy in the story is generated between Cruise and Mastrantonio - who, with her hard edge and her inbred cynicism, keeps the kid from ever feeling really sure of her. (Mastrantonio, an Oak Park River Forest High graduate, will be in town this weekend for a reunion.) It's a shame that even the tension of their relationship is allowed to evaporate in the closing scenes, where Cruise and the girl stand side by side and seem to speak from the same mind, as if she were a standard movie girlfriend and not a real original.
Watching Newman is always interesting in this movie. He has been a true star for many years, but sometimes that star quality has been thrown away. Scorsese has always been the kind of director who lets his camera stay on an actor's face, who looks deeply into them and tries to find the shadings that reveal their originality. In many of Newman's closeups in this movie, he shows an enormous power, a concentration and focus of his essence as an actor.
Newman, of course, had veto power over who would make this movie (because how could they make it without him?), and his instincts were sound in choosing Scorsese. Maybe the problems started with the story, when Newman or somebody decided that there had to be a young man in the picture; the introduction of the Cruise character opens the door for all of the preordained teacher-pupil cliches, when perhaps they should have just stayed with Newman and let him be at the center of the story.
Then Newman's character would have been free (as the Robert De Niro characters have been free in other Scorsese films) to follow his passions, hungers, fears and desires wherever they led him - instead of simply following the story down a well-traveled path.